Nerd Tests

by **MileHighGeekGuy** » Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:06 am

I think that they should make abortions legal but only if the style of abortion they have enables the baby to have a synthetic womb birth, which exists... Or else I would not have proposed it.

by **welshnerd** » Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:34 pm

MileHighGeekGuy wrote:I think that they should make abortions legal but only if the style of abortion they have enables the baby to have a synthetic womb birth, which exists... Or else I would not have proposed it.

They are legal in Great Britain.

In my opinion they should make abortions compulsary for girls under the legal age of legal sexual intercourse.

They have obviously broke the law in being impregnated and there punishment should be an abortion.

I see no problems with Abortions. But in my opinion contraception shouldv'e been used in the first place.

by **MileHighGeekGuy** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:31 am

The only people on earth who have a responsibility for the amount of responsibility in others is the government, and that is what it all comes to, governmental decisions, which will never completely follow logic due to corruption interspersed within the governments of the world. It is a tragedy that being in government for ones own gain is so profitable .

by **welshnerd** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:48 pm

Why is it that when I edit the above post to say sexual intersoure it says snacks intercourse?

by **welshnerd** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:49 pm

welshnerd wrote:Why is it that when I edit the above post to say snacks intersoure it says snacks intercourse?

Its doing it again!

Why does s e x u a l change to s n a c k s?

by **idk** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:51 pm

welshnerd wrote:
welshnerd wrote:Why is it that when I edit the above post to say snacks intersoure it says snacks intercourse?

Its doing it again!

Why does s e x u a l change to s n a c k s?

ZEH sensor my friend

by **ATP** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:16 pm

Why is this in the "I want..." forum? Did MileHigh make a mistake?

Also, I agree with MileHigh. I've heard that there's hardly any corruption in Sweden, and yet they're basically a welfare state...

by **MileHighGeekGuy** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:20 pm

No, because in my first post I am stating that I want something that does not exist, thus making it fit into the I want section OR the opinions section, but I decided the I want section looked a little dead, which means someone would most likely pay more attention to my thread if i posted it here.

by **ATP** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:28 pm

That's what I thought. What is a synthetic womb birth, anyway?

by **MileHighGeekGuy** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:38 pm

You create a womb that would logically follow the procedure of childbirth out side of a humans body, the child would then be put into the synthetic womb facilities orphanage(which I hope would be kept at good standards in the majority of cases).

by **ATP** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:45 pm

Is that even possible without hurting/killing the fetus?

by **MileHighGeekGuy** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:52 pm

It is plausible, but to know if it is possible would require experimentation with animals.

by **ATP** » Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:57 pm

And, of course, we wouldn't want to do that. I don't understand why women can't just have a baby and then put it up for adoption if they don't want it. Of course, chances are they WILL want it after they have it. Also, I think it would be a rare scenario that a woman's health was so impared that she could not have a baby normally or by c-section so that the baby had to be aborted. What do you think?

by **welshnerd** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:23 am

Why bring a child into a world to experience the poor quality of orphanage life?

Children need parents and if the parents don't want the child the pregnancy should be aborted.

Nerd Tests

Abortion(again)

Abortion(again)

Re: Abortion(again)

Who is online