George Bush....

[God]

Yeah I said it.... And its true.... And guess what!!! Our next pres is gonna be a Republican!!! You know why cause its either gonna be Obama or Clinton running for the dims in '08 and we arent ready for a woman or a black pres!

We are not ready!? Black and female people are no less competent at being president than white people are, so how could we not be ready yet?

[FutureAstronaut]

They say Condoleeza Rice is (maybe) going to run. Then we could have a black, female president.

[yoo_hoo]

Yeah I said it.... And its true.... And guess what!!! Our next pres is gonna be a Republican!!! You know why cause its either gonna be Obama or Clinton running for the dims in '08 and we arent ready for a woman or a black pres!

We are not ready!? Black and female people are no less competent at being president than white people are, so how could we not be ready yet?

Exactly. Earlier in our history, we wouldn't be ready. A black or female president would be looked down upon by everyone. Most people were racist and sexist in that time. If you weren't, you were scorned. Now, it's the opposite. Most people aren't racist or sexist. Actually, many are, but they hide it. Why? Because nowadays racists and sexists are scorned and hated by everyone. Our country wouldn't look down on a female black president.


So it's not that the people aren't ready. And I really hope you aren't saying a black female isn't ready to be president, Kobra.


Look down at my signature....

[Harmless Drudge]

bUsh is a great dog
he is a dog
he killing muslim child, woman and all poor people.

How dare you call him a dog? What have the dogs ever done to deserve this?

The Muslim world really needs to look inside on this one and discover that they are the cause of their own problems. They are the ones who subjugate and "convert" their enemies upon pain of death. They are the ones who blow themselves up. They are the ones who use their own children as cover and concealment when they stage their attacks, and then perpetually boo-hoo to the media when their children get hurt or killed. They are the ones who use children to sweep minefields. They are the ones who make their children decapitate western prisoners with rusty knives. They are the ones who air Mickey Mouse cartoons that extol the virtues of "martyrdom" and "Jihad." They are the ones who endorse and condone grade school plays in which the children pretend to blow themselves up to destroy Israel and the US. They are the ones who will not tolerate the existance of any country that does not embrace Sharia law. They are the ones who stone their sister to death if she has been accused of pre-marital sex. They are the ones who execute prisoners in crowded stadiums before soccer games. They are the ones who treat their women worse than they treat their dogs. They are the ones who have publicly proclaimed that they will convert or kill every last person on the planet. Islam is not a religion; it is a philosophy of hate. The western world, particularly the United States and especially Israel, have acted with remarkable restraint in dealing with the stone-faced philosophy of unwarranted violence and murder that typifies Islam today.

Look at all of the wars around the world today, and you will find that Muslims started almost every single one of them. My biggest grievance with George W Bush is that he is not fighting this like it is a real war. In a real war, there would have been far more collateral damage, and nothing but wide-eyed disbelief from whatever Arabs might have been left after we turned the region into a parking lot.

[Harmless Drudge]

Yeah I said it.... And its true.... And guess what!!! Our next pres is gonna be a Republican!!! You know why cause its either gonna be Obama or Clinton running for the dims in '08 and we arent ready for a woman or a black pres!

In a 2-party showdown, neither Clinton nor Obama could ever win. Hillary Clinton is permanently chained to every scandal the US has endured since the early '90's. Her name is synonomous with shame. Obama can't recite a speech without plagiarising FDR, JFK, LBJ, ACLU, etc. The man hasn't had an original thought in his life. Ever. Not a one.

Unfortunately, this is unlikely to be the standard rednecks versus homos mudfest now that Bloomberg (-R + -D + -I) is angling to throw his hat in the ring. Because he was recently a RINO, and because most people can't remember what they had for lunch, let alone the political record of an obscure candidate, he will probably tap more of the Republican vote than the Democrat vote. He may be the new Ross Perot.

On top of that, the Republican party has, by and large, resigned its credentials in the world of vertibrates and its members have tried to outflank the left's left flank on the left. On every pivotal issue, they fold faster than Superman on laundry day. The only decent human beings left in the Republican party, like Tancredo and Hunter, are shelved as second-tier candidates. I only hope a charismatic and honest leader like Thompson jumps in and resumes his previous career of Dem-slappery. Now that might win an election.

[Harmless Drudge]

Yeah I said it.... And its true.... And guess what!!! Our next pres is gonna be a Republican!!! You know why cause its either gonna be Obama or Clinton running for the dims in '08 and we arent ready for a woman or a black pres!

We are not ready!? Black and female people are no less competent at being president than white people are, so how could we not be ready yet?

A woman could most certainly win. But not a woman who spends her entire life screeching abortionist mantras. A black could most definitely win, but not a black whose party is tied to affirmative action, quotas, and reparations. Could Liddy Dole or J.C. Watts make it to the White House? Easily. In fact, I was hoping Elizabeth Dole would have been the Republican candidate back in 2000. But Clinton and Obama are members of the minorities who their party wants to grant unpopular favors to. Unless there is a significant spoiler candidacy (like Perot was), neither of them stand a chance.

[Harmless Drudge]

Most people were racist and snacks in that time. If you weren't, you were scorned. Now, it's the opposite. Most people aren't racist or snacks. Actually, many are, but they hide it. Why? Because nowadays racists and snacks are scorned and hated by everyone. Our country wouldn't look down on a female black president.

Racism, $exism, and discrimination are alive and well here in the USA. They now parade as Affirmative Action, "tolerance" (ironic, eh?), and welfare. The entire purpose of these mentalities is to take credit for those things that minorities do for themselves.

[cohen avshalom]

this man is today the big caesar of the world-but when rome empire were falling that wasnt help for the empirer of her-i hoop the new rival take his power-and i mean the china-the arabic-the russian-the Latin and so on...

cohen avshalom charly
israel/haifa
www.icarus5.com

[oxymoron]

bUsh is a great dog
he is a dog
he killing muslim child, woman and all poor people.

How dare you call him a dog? What have the dogs ever done to deserve this?

Look at all of the wars around the world today, and you will find that Muslims started almost every single one of them. My biggest grievance with George W Bush is that he is not fighting this like it is a real war. In a real war, there would have been far more collateral damage, and nothing but wide-eyed disbelief from whatever Arabs might have been left after we turned the region into a parking lot.

Why don't you look at all the imperialist nations in the world? Almost all of them had mainly white people. Should a nation attack another country that has mostly white people to prevent being colonized? Should we say that white people are all imperialists? You've made it clear that you're a bigot.

[EdTheN00bProgrammer]

bUsh is a great dog
he is a dog
he killing muslim child, woman and all poor people.

How dare you call him a dog? What have the dogs ever done to deserve this?

The Muslim world really needs to look inside on this one and discover that they are the cause of their own problems. They are the ones who subjugate and "convert" their enemies upon pain of death. They are the ones who blow themselves up. They are the ones who use their own children as cover and concealment when they stage their attacks, and then perpetually boo-hoo to the media when their children get hurt or killed. They are the ones who use children to sweep minefields. They are the ones who make their children decapitate western prisoners with rusty knives. They are the ones who air Mickey Mouse cartoons that extol the virtues of "martyrdom" and "Jihad." They are the ones who endorse and condone grade school plays in which the children pretend to blow themselves up to destroy Israel and the US. They are the ones who will not tolerate the existance of any country that does not embrace Sharia law. They are the ones who stone their sister to death if she has been accused of pre-marital snacks. They are the ones who execute prisoners in crowded stadiums before soccer games. They are the ones who treat their women worse than they treat their dogs. They are the ones who have publicly proclaimed that they will convert or kill every last person on the planet.

I don't like the words 'they are the ones'; it seems to refer to all Muslims, as it says 'they'; there aren't many Muslim worlds, but there are many people. 'Their' implies that you are referring to many people. This leads me to the assumption that you refer to all Muslims.

Now because dogmatism isn't very common, I'll alter that assumption and assume that you really mean that Muslims generally do all of these aforementioned attrocities. If this is what you mean, fair enough.

But I still disagree with this; I think that Muslims are given a bad image in the media; even if there is an overrepresentation of people who committ these atrocities in Muslims, I don't think that the majority of Muslims are like this. If they were, the world would probably have ended by now.

Islam is not a religion; it is a philosophy of hate.

Is it not possibly for something to be both?

The western world, particularly the United States and especially Israel, have acted with remarkable restraint in dealing with the stone-faced philosophy of unwarranted violence and murder that typifies Islam today.

Look at all of the wars around the world today, and you will find that Muslims started almost every single one of them. My biggest grievance with George W Bush is that he is not fighting this like it is a real war. In a real war, there would have been far more collateral damage, and nothing but wide-eyed disbelief from whatever Arabs might have been left after we turned the region into a parking lot.

It's unfair to slaughter lots of civilians unnecessarily, so regions should not be 'turned into parking lots', but rather be captured with few deaths and little damage. Punishing evildoers is fair enough; punishing lots of innocent poeple around evildoers is not - what could justify such unneccessary murder?

I agree, however, that George Bush isn't fighting wars like real wars; he's invading a country and telling his troops to withdraw because of a very small amount of losses, pressumably for political reasons: if he makes it seem vaguely as if America and the West is under threat, people will delude themselves into believing it to spice up their lives; they will givethemselves little adventures. Bush preaches about national security and people believe him because either they want to or they've deluded themselves into believing in so-called threats such as 'terrorist groups'.

Well I have news for America: it's partially ran by terrorists!

I believe that George Bush is a terrorist; he uses terror to gain votes. He doesn't want Al Quaeda to be defeated - it's a great political tool! Okay, so pressumably not every American politician in power is a terrorist, but you get the idea.

The same goes for much of the media; many people running the media are terrorists, exagerating this so-called war on terrorism so that their media will sell.

People really need to grow up out of their masochistic self-delusions and accept that their nation isn't going to explode in two minutes' time.

We need to confront the real threats: the growin strength of on-democratic countries. We need to invade and make wars to ensure long term security; we must liberate China and North Korea before they become too powerful to liberate and perhaps even capture our countries.

We need to encourage and aid revulsions in some dictatorships to indirectly destroy them so that they don't attack us, but rather the rebels. this way, they won't use nukes because the rebels are on their own soil. I know, it's not ideal but it's better than nuclear war.

[Harmless Drudge]

Look at all of the wars around the world today, and you will find that Muslims started almost every single one of them. My biggest grievance with George W Bush is that he is not fighting this like it is a real war. In a real war, there would have been far more collateral damage, and nothing but wide-eyed disbelief from whatever Arabs might have been left after we turned the region into a parking lot.

Why don't you look at all the imperialist nations in the world? Almost all of them had mainly white people. Should a nation attack another country that has mostly white people to prevent being colonized? Should we say that white people are all imperialists? You've made it clear that you're a bigot.

When you speak of imperialism, you speak in the past tense. There is a reson for this. And as unhumane and atrocious as European imperialism was (I revel in watching the former empires shrivel back into their original borders and become useless, anemic socialist do-nothings), Islam is fore more malevolent and intrinsically evil than Euro imperialism ever was. If you want proof of this, go to a Muslim country. You're a girl, right? Go outside without a hijab, or go out unescorted my a male relative. If you come back alive, you will no longer consider me a bigot.

[Harmless Drudge]

bUsh is a great dog
he is a dog
he killing muslim child, woman and all poor people.

How dare you call him a dog? What have the dogs ever done to deserve this?

The Muslim world really needs to look inside on this one and discover that they are the cause of their own problems. They are the ones who subjugate and "convert" their enemies upon pain of death. They are the ones who blow themselves up. They are the ones who use their own children as cover and concealment when they stage their attacks, and then perpetually boo-hoo to the media when their children get hurt or killed. They are the ones who use children to sweep minefields. They are the ones who make their children decapitate western prisoners with rusty knives. They are the ones who air Mickey Mouse cartoons that extol the virtues of "martyrdom" and "Jihad." They are the ones who endorse and condone grade school plays in which the children pretend to blow themselves up to destroy Israel and the US. They are the ones who will not tolerate the existance of any country that does not embrace Sharia law. They are the ones who stone their sister to death if she has been accused of pre-marital snacks. They are the ones who execute prisoners in crowded stadiums before soccer games. They are the ones who treat their women worse than they treat their dogs. They are the ones who have publicly proclaimed that they will convert or kill every last person on the planet.

I don't like the words 'they are the ones'; it seems to refer to all Muslims, as it says 'they'; there aren't many Muslim worlds, but there are many people. 'Their' implies that you are referring to many people. This leads me to the assumption that you refer to all Muslims.

Now because dogmatism isn't very common, I'll alter that assumption and assume that you really mean that Muslims generally do all of these aforementioned attrocities. If this is what you mean, fair enough.

But I still disagree with this; I think that Muslims are given a bad image in the media; even if there is an overrepresentation of people who committ these atrocities in Muslims, I don't think that the majority of Muslims are like this. If they were, the world would probably have ended by now.

[quote]


It is an endemic problem. I don't remember seeing any imams or mullahs on TV or in the papers denouncing 9/11. I don't remember seeing protests/marches/demonstrations/interviews/notices/advertisements from Muslims dissociating themselves from terrorist actions. In fact, the only gesture similar to this that I have seen is from the wife of one if the Indian doctors involved in the recent plot in the UK. If the Muslim world did not agree with these actions, they would denounce them. I know that if my next door neighbor blew up a Muslim shrine in the name of esus, every church within dashing distance of a camera would be on TV explaining that his actions are contrary to their religion. Silence is complicity, plain and simple.

[oxymoron]

Look at all of the wars around the world today, and you will find that Muslims started almost every single one of them. My biggest grievance with George W Bush is that he is not fighting this like it is a real war. In a real war, there would have been far more collateral damage, and nothing but wide-eyed disbelief from whatever Arabs might have been left after we turned the region into a parking lot.

Why don't you look at all the imperialist nations in the world? Almost all of them had mainly white people. Should a nation attack another country that has mostly white people to prevent being colonized? Should we say that white people are all imperialists? You've made it clear that you're a bigot.

When you speak of imperialism, you speak in the past tense. There is a reson for this. And as unhumane and atrocious as European imperialism was (I revel in watching the former empires shrivel back into their original borders and become useless, anemic socialist do-nothings), Islam is fore more malevolent and intrinsically evil than Euro imperialism ever was. If you want proof of this, go to a Muslim country. You're a girl, right? Go outside without a hijab, or go out unescorted my a male relative. If you come back alive, you will no longer consider me a bigot.

I used to live in Qatar, which has mainly Muslims, but women can still go outside without a hijab.

I'm just wondering, have you ever met a Muslim?
If you have, you may change your mind and realize that the Muslims on TV are like the smokers on TV. They're different from the everyday ones.

[Sipidy]

Run maniac in office he is CRAZY AND CONTAGIOUS you see i hate him look at this

I bet everyone in his family is wearing a mask and really looks like that!