THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (the proof)

[tsolkas]

Equivalence Principle of the General Theory of Relativity, is absolutely wrong!

more...http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html

Christos A Tsolkas

[hubble]

OMFG!!!! i'll take your word for it, though that is something i have to look up, and cant without ever having done physics.

[Jonathon]

Yeah well you konw what, X2x2x2xx2x7x87027x972x8709787287x9820=x287287227x82x8x2x*C84833453245 to you to buddy, I can't understand any of that

[ian_yap]

LoL....it is damm chim. I tried to analyse it and ask my physics teacher, but he say he also can get confused.
any of u can understand it?

[Hollow]

http://www.thefinaltheory.com

[ian_yap]

http://www.thefinaltheory.com

cool...where can i get it?

[Lume]

My understanding is that the equivalence principle is just the idea that you can treat the way a gravitational field acts on a body the same way you can treat the body accelerating, even though gravity is fundamentally a warp in space-time and acceleration is simply force applied to a body to increase it's velocity/second--which are obviously two different "forces".

I assume the original poster has no clue what the website is about. I also assume that if the equivalence prinicple was replaced with a better model of reality, it would be published in a scientific journal, and not be brought in the form of spam on a random nerd forum. I could be wrong, but these are my assumptions.

[tsolkas]

Einstein :

"....the fundamental property of the gravitational field of giving all bodies the same acceleration...."

WRONG!!!, WRONG!!!, WRONG!!!,..............!!!!!! "Dear Einstein"........!!!!

The above conclusion, is the great error of Einstein!!!


GALILEO, IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!! (attention! IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!)
An another solution of the problem.......

http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1 ... lence.html



Dr. Tsolkas

[Affray]

I read an article about that at school. There was a guy who chalanged the theory of relativity and he even changed Newtons second law ( I think its F=ma). Which is of course a cornerstone of the physics world.

[hubble]

as long as they dont change w=d*f....

[tsolkas]

THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE FREE- FALL OF BODIES

see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html



Christos A. Tsolkas

[hubble]

* All of those clever reasons were Wrong. Right and Wrong do exist. just because you don't know what the right answer is--maybe theres no way you could know the right answer is-- that doesn't make your answer right or even ok. its much simpler that.
Its just plain wrong.

*made ME excited about a real scientific discovery when very little gets me excited anymore.

*never told anyone about these "discoveries"

* posted the lies on a site where people who know whats going on in the world of physics

* didn't translate ineffable twaddle of workings by a bored mathmatical person

* went on to claim to prove my second favourite scientist wrong...

* is about to be SLUAGHTERED, IN THE BIBLICAL FASHION, if he doesn't PISS OFF right now. cos i can be really nasty, to
people who pretend to be intelligent but aren't. [if you were, you wouldn't have made any flaws. Mistakes are as serious as the results they cause!]

[oxymoron]

I think it's bull shit, but I guess he's just like any other spammer, except he is trying to appeal to us with what may be pseudo-mathematics.

[sn4k3]

if the theory of relativity says that all can be relative depending on your point of view, so......... the theory of relativity is relative and in conclusion the theory of relativity is true

well, just my opinion.

[oxymoron]

I read an article about that at school. There was a guy who chalanged the theory of relativity and he even changed Newtons second law ( I think its F=ma). Which is of course a cornerstone of the physics world.

What did he change the law to?